[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0901301953280.3150@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 19:57:28 -0800 (PST)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [patch 3/7] epoll keyed wakeups - introduce key-aware wakeup
macros
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> Would be nice to see the kernel image size increase due to this change
> (which gives a good measure about how much of an issue this is).
Ingo, I don't think you have looked at that header file for a while.
It's already doing that, Davide just changed the names a bit:
#define wake_up_interruptible(x) __wake_up(x, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, 1, NULL)
and the extra parameter is already there in the caller.
(Yeah, Davide did add it to __wake_up_locked and __wake_up_sync, but those
are really not the common cases).
Sure, we can change those #define's to be actual functions (and perhaps
not export the low-level __wake_up() functions at all), since it's true
that it would probably shrink the kernel size, but that is really a
totally independent issue from the whole epoll wakeups thing.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists