linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH F 10/12] OMAP2/3 clock: omap2_clk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090131105848.GC1394@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Sat, 31 Jan 2009 10:58:48 +0000
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH F 10/12] OMAP2/3 clock: omap2_clk_enable(): fix logic

On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:35:28PM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> Rearrange the parent clock enable status check code so it actually makes
> sense.  No functional change.

I don't think there's anything gained from introducing the additional
'parent_ret' variable.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/