linux-kernel - Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1233421901.4787.27.camel@laptop>
Date:	Sat, 31 Jan 2009 18:11:41 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
	Alexey Zaytsev <alexey.zaytsev@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes

On Sat, 2009-01-31 at 00:09 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> Alexey Zaytsev (1):
>       x86: set the initial softirq preempt count to SOFTIRQ_OFFSET

> Nick Piggin (1):
>       sched: improve preempt debugging

> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c
> index 74b9ff7..8d99de6 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c
> @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ void __cpuinit irq_ctx_init(int cpu)
>  	irqctx->tinfo.task		= NULL;
>  	irqctx->tinfo.exec_domain	= NULL;
>  	irqctx->tinfo.cpu		= cpu;
> -	irqctx->tinfo.preempt_count	= 0;
> +	irqctx->tinfo.preempt_count	= SOFTIRQ_OFFSET;
>  	irqctx->tinfo.addr_limit	= MAKE_MM_SEG(0);
>  
>  	softirq_ctx[cpu] = irqctx;

> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
> index 52bbf1c..5686bb5 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -4440,7 +4450,7 @@ void __kprobes sub_preempt_count(int val)
>  	/*
>  	 * Underflow?
>  	 */
> -	if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(val > preempt_count()))
> +       if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(val > preempt_count() - (!!kernel_locked())))
>  		return;
>  	/*
>  	 * Is the spinlock portion underflowing?

I'm not at all convinced this is going to work well.

For one, why does only i386 suffer this problem?

Secondly, it seems to cause i386 lockdep troubles as
__local_bh_disable() and _local_bh_enable_ip() their
trace_softirqs_off/on() conditions won't ever trigger when ran in that
irq context.

One possible solution to that latter problem might be calling those
trace points unconditionally in __do_softirq() like the patch below
does, but that will generate a lot of redundant trace calls on basically
all other platforms.

All in all, it all seems rather a bit of a mess :-(

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
---
 kernel/softirq.c |    3 ++-
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
index 3dd0d13..25b4691 100644
--- a/kernel/softirq.c
+++ b/kernel/softirq.c
@@ -191,6 +191,7 @@ asmlinkage void __do_softirq(void)
 	account_system_vtime(current);
 
 	__local_bh_disable((unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(0));
+	trace_softirqs_off();
 	trace_softirq_enter();
 
 	cpu = smp_processor_id();
@@ -232,7 +233,7 @@ restart:
 		wakeup_softirqd();
 
 	trace_softirq_exit();
-
+	trace_softirqs_on();
 	account_system_vtime(current);
 	_local_bh_enable();
 }


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/