linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.29-rc3: tg3 dead after resume

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200901310107.48623.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date:	Sat, 31 Jan 2009 01:07:47 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@...il.com>,
	Matt Carlson <mcarlson@...adcom.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.29-rc3: tg3 dead after resume

On Saturday 31 January 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 31 Jan 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > 
> > I wonder if this change makes any difference:
> > 
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> > +++ linux-2.6/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> > @@ -501,6 +501,9 @@ static int pci_pm_suspend(struct device
> >  	if (pci_has_legacy_pm_support(pci_dev))
> >  		return pci_legacy_suspend(dev, PMSG_SUSPEND);
> >  
> > +	if (!drv || !drv->pm)
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> >  	if (drv && drv->pm && drv->pm->suspend) {
> >  		error = drv->pm->suspend(dev);
> >  		suspend_report_result(drv->pm->suspend, error);
> 
> I don't think that's right. Now you don't end up calling 
> pci_pm_default_suspend_generic() at all, and this no pci_save_state().
> 
> But I think it could easily be the call to pci_disable_enabled_device(). 
> It does that
> 
> 	if (atomic_read(&dev->enable_cnt))
> 		do_pci_disable_device(dev);
> 
> and that ends up disabling PCI_COMMAND_MASTER and then calling 
> pcibios_disable_device().
> 
> Any device we have ever done pci_enable_device() on would trigger this, 
> which includes PCIE bridges, for example. And while the pcie driver does 
> that
> 
> 	pcie_portdrv_restore_config ->
> 		pci_enable_device(dev);
> 
> thing to re-enable it, that's a no-op since the enable_count is already 
> non-zero.
> 
> And we do try to restore it (pci_restore_standard_config() will call 
> pci_restore_state()), but since we've done the 
> pci_disable_enabled_device() _before_ we did the pci_save_state(), we now 
> restore a non-working setup. 
> 
> I think. The rules are too damn subtle there.  Rafael, can you look around 
> a bit?

Sure, I'm looking at it right now.

Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/