linux-kernel - Re: [git pull -tip] headers_check fixes for other architectures

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090201170647.GA21913@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Sun, 1 Feb 2009 17:06:47 +0000
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	hskinnemoen@...el.com, cooloney@...nel.org, tony.luck@...el.com,
	ralf@...ux-mips.org, dhowells@...hat.com, matthew@....cx,
	chris@...kel.net, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git pull -tip] headers_check fixes for other architectures

On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 05:49:15PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> 
> > > These patches fixes 41 headers_check warnings as shown in first email.
> > 
> > Pulled into tip/core/header-fixes, thanks Jaswinder!
> 
> These are the remaining ones on x86:
> 
>      17 /dev/shm/tip/usr/include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h
>      12 /dev/shm/tip/usr/include/linux/soundcard.h
>       6 /dev/shm/tip/usr/include/asm/setup.h
>       3 /dev/shm/tip/usr/include/linux/nubus.h
>       2 /dev/shm/tip/usr/include/linux/in6.h
>       1 /dev/shm/tip/usr/include/mtd/jffs2-user.h
>       1 /dev/shm/tip/usr/include/linux/socket.h
>       1 /dev/shm/tip/usr/include/linux/coda_psdev.h
>       1 /dev/shm/tip/usr/include/asm/prctl.h
> 
> They are all of the "extern's make no sense in userspace" type. What was the 
> verdict, are they worth touching, or should we turn off this warning in 
> 'make headers_check'?

So, what's this all about?

You know, if there's something that is relevant to others and you want to
_add_ them to the CC, at least leave enough of the original message so the
new people who are being CC'd have some clue what the hell the thread is 
about, and more importantly where to get the patches being discussed.

Until then, if this includes any ARM bits, NAK, because I don't know
what those changes are.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/