| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20090201212243.GA23852@dreamland.darkstar.lan>
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 22:22:43 +0100
From: Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@...il.com>
To: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
khali@...ux-fr.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: add "auto" to acpi_enforce_resources
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 03:29:13PM +0100, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> I thought it may only be one specific hwmon driver which could
> interfere on ASUS boards with the ATK0110 device. I agree that
> it would not make sense to cluster all hwmon drivers.
>
> The problem is similar to the video backlight switching problem
> (legacy drivers vs preferred generic ACPI video driver) where
> you also must know which driver to take before module loading time.
>
> I hoped to be able to come up with something more clever or say a nicer
> solution or at least a short discussion. But I also have no better idea.
> Maybe all such code should end up in a drivers/acpi/quirks.c file
> at some time, similar to other places in the kernel.
>
> I think it's time for Len looking at this. I wonder whether he will take
> this patch or why he won't.
> This is an ugly problem which unfortunately needs an ugly fix/check.
I've rewritten the patch, the idea behind it is still the same but the
solution is more generic. The code checks a list of DMI entries and
(optionally) a HID for each entry; if the DMI data matches and the HID
(if not NULL) is found then resource checking is set to strict, otherwise
it falls back to lax.
---
Just RFC, it's still UNTESTED...
drivers/acpi/osl.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 76 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/osl.c b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
index 6729a49..c6d1a1c 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
@@ -1063,7 +1063,10 @@ __setup("acpi_wake_gpes_always_on", acpi_wake_gpes_always_on_setup);
* in arbitrary AML code and can interfere with legacy drivers.
* acpi_enforce_resources= can be set to:
*
- * - strict (2)
+ * - auto (2)
+ * -> detect possible conflicts with ACPI drivers and switch to
+ * strict if needed, otherwise act like lax
+ * - strict (3)
* -> further driver trying to access the resources will not load
* - lax (default) (1)
* -> further driver trying to access the resources will load, but you
@@ -1073,11 +1076,12 @@ __setup("acpi_wake_gpes_always_on", acpi_wake_gpes_always_on_setup);
* -> ACPI Operation Region resources will not be registered
*
*/
-#define ENFORCE_RESOURCES_STRICT 2
+#define ENFORCE_RESOURCES_STRICT 3
+#define ENFORCE_RESOURCES_AUTO 2
#define ENFORCE_RESOURCES_LAX 1
#define ENFORCE_RESOURCES_NO 0
-static unsigned int acpi_enforce_resources = ENFORCE_RESOURCES_LAX;
+static unsigned int acpi_enforce_resources = ENFORCE_RESOURCES_AUTO;
static int __init acpi_enforce_resources_setup(char *str)
{
@@ -1086,6 +1090,8 @@ static int __init acpi_enforce_resources_setup(char *str)
if (!strcmp("strict", str))
acpi_enforce_resources = ENFORCE_RESOURCES_STRICT;
+ else if (!strcmp("auto", str))
+ acpi_enforce_resources = ENFORCE_RESOURCES_AUTO;
else if (!strcmp("lax", str))
acpi_enforce_resources = ENFORCE_RESOURCES_LAX;
else if (!strcmp("no", str))
@@ -1096,6 +1102,73 @@ static int __init acpi_enforce_resources_setup(char *str)
__setup("acpi_enforce_resources=", acpi_enforce_resources_setup);
+static acpi_status acpi_res_quick_check_hid_cb(acpi_handle obj_handle,
+ u32 nesting_level, void *context, void **return_value)
+{
+ *((bool *)return_value) = true;
+ return AE_CTRL_TERMINATE;
+}
+
+static int acpi_res_quick_check_hid(const struct dmi_system_id *d)
+{
+ acpi_status ret;
+ bool found = false;
+ char *hid;
+
+ if (!d->driver_data)
+ goto strict;
+
+ hid = d->driver_data;
+ ret = acpi_get_devices(hid, acpi_res_quick_check_hid_cb,
+ NULL, (void **)&found);
+
+ if (ret == AE_OK && found)
+ goto strict;
+
+ return 0;
+strict:
+ printk(KERN_DEBUG "ACPI: detected %s system: "
+ "enforcing strict resource checking\n", d->ident);
+ return 1;
+}
+
+/* The following systems have ACPI drivers that might overlap the
+ * functionality of native drivers (mostly in hwmon subsys). If
+ * acpi_enforce_resources is set to auto the following table is
+ * used to enforce strict checking in matching systems, in order
+ * to avoid conflicts.
+ * Note that driver_data and the acpi_res_quick_check_hid callback
+ * are used to further refine the match, checking for the presence
+ * of the given HID (driver_data) in the DSDT. Both fields are
+ * optional for DMI-only rules.
+ */
+static const struct dmi_system_id resource_quirks[] = {
+ {
+ .ident = "Asus",
+ .matches = {
+ DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_VENDOR, "ASUSTeK Computer"),
+ },
+ .driver_data = "ATK0110",
+ .callback = acpi_res_quick_check_hid,
+ },
+ { }
+};
+
+static int __init acpi_apply_resource_quirk(void)
+{
+ if (acpi_enforce_resources != ENFORCE_RESOURCES_AUTO)
+ return 0;
+
+ dmi_check_system(resource_quirks);
+
+ if (acpi_enforce_resources == ENFORCE_RESOURCES_AUTO)
+ /* This system is not listed, fallback to 'lax' */
+ acpi_enforce_resources = ENFORCE_RESOURCES_LAX;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+fs_initcall(acpi_apply_resource_quirk);
+
/* Check for resource conflicts between ACPI OperationRegions and native
* drivers */
int acpi_check_resource_conflict(struct resource *res)
Luca
--
Mi piace avere amici rispettabili;
Mi piace essere il peggiore della compagnia.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists