[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 20:53:12 +0300
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [git-pull -tip] fix headers_check warnings
[H. Peter Anvin - Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 09:49:14AM -0800]
| Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
| >>
| >> Hi Jaswinder,
| >>
| >> it seems we have a clash here :) I thought this part
| >> was just dropped out
| >>
| >> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/461
| >>
| >> and Peter had been applying it on tip:x86/header-fixes
| >>
| >> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/549
| >>
| >> but maybe it's just lost...
| >
| > No, you cannot remove sys_arch_prctl otherwise you will get sparse
| > warning like this:
| >
| > CHECK arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
| > arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c:833:6: warning: symbol 'sys_arch_prctl' was not declared. Should it be static?
| >
|
| Perhaps we can just move this prototype to <asm/syscalls.h>.
|
| -hpa
|
| --
| H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
| I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
|
Hmm...
For internal use we refer to do_arch_prctl and
sys_arch_prctl supposed to be syscall wrapper.
Yes, Peter, you're right! It seems this call
was missed there.
-Cyrill-
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists