[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4987D3AD.1080605@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 21:18:37 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Martin Hicks <mort@....com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
heukelum@...lshack.com,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kdb@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: push old stack address on irqstack for unwinder
Martin Hicks wrote:
>
> I was searching around, trying to find out if there was another way for
> kdb to do this, and I think removing the backlink is breaking other
> stuff also. dump_trace() in dumpstack_64.S is using the same trick as
> KDB to trace out of the interrupt stack:
>
OK, that makes it a no-brainer. Applied to tip:x86/urgent, thanks!
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists