[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090203145504.0ffef746.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:55:04 +0900
From: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
To: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"lizf@...fujitsu.com" <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [-mm patch] Show memcg information during OOM
> > > diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
> > > index d3b9bac..b8e53ae 100644
> > > --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
> > > +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
> > > @@ -392,6 +392,7 @@ static int oom_kill_process(struct task_struct *p, gfp_t gfp_mask, int order,
> > > current->comm, gfp_mask, order, current->oomkilladj);
> > > task_lock(current);
> > > cpuset_print_task_mems_allowed(current);
> > > + mem_cgroup_print_mem_info(mem);
> >
> > mem is only !NULL when we come from mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(). This
> > crashes otherwise in mem_cgroup_print_mem_info(), no?
> >
> I think you're right.
>
> IMHO, "mem_cgroup_print_mem_info(current)" would be better here,
> and call mem_cgroup_from_task at mem_cgroup_print_mem_info.
>
Reading other messages on this thread, mem_cgroup_print_mem_info
should be called only when oom_kill_process is called from mem_cgroup_out_of_memory,
so checking "if (!mem)" would be enough.
Thanks,
Daisuke Nishimura.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists