linux-kernel - Re: PCI PM: Restore standard config registers of all devices early

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200902030129.52445.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date:	Tue, 3 Feb 2009 01:29:51 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jesse Barnes <jesse.barnes@...el.com>,
	Andreas Schwab <schwab@...e.de>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: PCI PM: Restore standard config registers of all devices early

On Tuesday 03 February 2009, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> 
> > But we can't tell no one is holding the mutex in question, AFAICS.
> > 
> > I'm afraid we'd really need a special "no mutexes, no GFP_KERNEL allocations"
> > code path for that.
> 
> No, the mutex shouldn't be held already, if it is, you're probably
> already in deep trouble. IE, you probably want to enfore that anyway,
> ie, it wouldn't be very sane to suspend the machine while ACPI was
> already in the -middle- of interpreting something anyway.
> 
> IE, you should have something to ensure, before you turn interrupts off,
> that nobody else is inside the AML interpreter. You already know there
> are no other CPUs, so it's just a matter of making sure no other process
> has scheduled while holding that mutex.
> 
> The easy way to do that is to do something like taking the mutex
> yourself and then setting a flag so that the intepreter stops trying to
> take it or release it itself, maybe just using the global system state.
> 
> Then release the mutex on resume.

Yes, that should work.

> All of these are issues that exist today. IE. Regardless of that
> powermac problem, which is unrelated (see other posts), I think these
> things need to be sorted cleanly or suspend will not be as rock solid as
> it could/should be. IE. It's several order of magnitude better than it
> was, I agree, but I believe we have here a few reasonably simple things
> we can/should do to make it more robust.

Agreed.

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/