[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090203123338.GA9446@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 23:33:38 +1100
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
Cc: david@...g.hm, Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, w@....eu,
dada1@...mosbay.com, ben@...s.com, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
jens.axboe@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tcp: splice as many packets as possible at once
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 03:30:15PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
>
> But we can proceed the discussion in case something interesting will
> appear. For example I can hack up e1000e driver to do a dumb copy of 9k
> each time it has received a jumbo frame and compare it with usual 1.5k
> MTU performance. But getting that modern CPUs are loafing with noticebly
> big IO chunks, this may only show that CPU was increased with the copy.
> But still may work.
Comparing performance is pointless because the only time you need
to do the copy is when the allocator has failed. So there is *no*
alternative to copying, regardless of how slow it is.
You can always improve the allocator whether we do this copying
fallback or not.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists