[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49887D80.8090708@goop.org>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 09:23:12 -0800
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
CC: Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC WIP] x86/paravirt: add register-saving thunks to reduce
caller register pressure
Pavel Machek wrote:
>> This patch seeks to alleviate this pressure by introducing wrapper
>> thunks that will do the register saving/restoring, so that the
>> callsite doesn't need to worry about it, but the callee function can
>> be conventional compiler-generated code. In many cases (particularly
>> performance-sensitive cases) the callee will be in assembler anyway,
>> and need not use the compiler's calling convention.
>>
>> Standard calling convention is:
>> arguments return scratch
>> x86-32 eax edx ecx eax ?
>>
>
> esi edi ebp ?
>
Those are callee-save, so the caller doesn't need to worry about
preserving their values.
> actually standard calling convention is all arguments on stack iirc
> but we use regparm=3 for kernel...?
>
Yes. "standard" = "standard kernel calling convention"
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists