[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090203173612.GA3528@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 18:36:12 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: fix 32-bit build resulting from mmu move
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> * Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Moving the mmu code from enlighten.c to mmu.c inadvertently broke the
>>> 32-bit build. Fix it.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/x86/xen/mmu.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
>>>
>>
>> that goes on top of the recent tip/x86/paravirt changes, right? No
>> objections, i'm wondering why my testing didnt find any build breakage.
>> Could you send me a .config that triggers the breakage?
>
> Any x86-32 + Xen build would hit it. +highmem+highpte would break a bit
> more.
i have a lot of successful builds with that pattern, that's why i asked for
a specific config from you that definitely triggers it - i'd like to
investigate how it escaped my testing procedures.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists