[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49888DD3.6000903@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 10:32:51 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/asm] x86: document 64-bit and 32-bit function call convention
ABI
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> - also clean up the calling.h file a tiny bit
>
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/calling.h | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/calling.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/calling.h
> index 2bc162e..2d36d42 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/calling.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/calling.h
> @@ -1,5 +1,55 @@
> /*
> - * Some macros to handle stack frames in assembly.
> +
> + x86 function call convention, 64-bit:
> + -------------------------------------
> + arguments | callee-saved | extra caller-saved | return
> + [callee-clobbered] | | [callee-clobbered] |
> + ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> + rdi rsi rdx rcx r8-9 | rbx rbp [*] r12-15 | r10-11 | rax, rdx [**]
> +
> + ( rsp is obviously invariant across normal function calls. (gcc can 'merge'
> + functions when it sees tail-call optimization possibilities) rflags is
> + clobbered. Leftover arguments are passed over the stack frame.)
> +
> + [*] In the frame-pointers case ebp is fixed to the stack frame.
ebp or rbp ?
> +
> + [**] for struct return values wider than 64 bits the return convention is a
> + bit more complex: up to 128 bits width we return small structures
> + straight in rax, rdx. For structures larger than that (3 words or
What size does "word" mean here?
and is it rdx:rax (high:low)? Can it be so written?
or at least say which of rax, rdx is high (most significant) and
which is low (least significant).
> + larger) the caller puts a pointer to an on-stack return struct
> + [allocated in the caller's stack frame] into the first argument - i.e.
> + into rdi. All other arguments shift up by one in this case.
> + Fortunately this case is rare in the kernel.
> +
> +For 32-bit we have the following conventions - kernel is build with
built
> +-mregparm=3 and -freg-struct-return:
> +
> + x86 function calling convention, 32-bit:
> + ----------------------------------------
> + arguments | callee-saved | extra caller-saved | return
> + [callee-clobbered] | | [callee-clobbered] |
> + -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> + eax edx ecx | ebx edi esi ebp [*] | <none> | eax, edx [**]
> +
> + ( here too esp is obviously invariant across normal function calls. eflags
> + is clobbered. Leftover arguments are passed over the stack frame. )
> +
> + [*] In the frame-pointers case ebp is fixed to the stack frame.
> +
> + [**] We build with -freg-struct-return, which on 32-bit means similar
> + semantics as on 64-bit: edx can be used for a second return value
> + (i.e. covering integer and structure sizes up to 64 bits) - after that
> + it gets more complex and more expensive: 3-word or larger struct returns
> + get done in the caller's frame and the pointer to the return struct goes
> + into regparm0, i.e. eax - the other arguments shift up and the
> + function's register parameters degenerate to regparm=2 in essence.
> +
Same high:low comments here.
> +*/
> +
> +
> +/*
> + * 64-bit system call stack frame layout defines and helpers,
> + * for assembly code:
> */
>
> #define R15 0
> @@ -9,7 +59,7 @@
> #define RBP 32
> #define RBX 40
>
> -/* arguments: interrupts/non tracing syscalls only save upto here*/
> +/* arguments: interrupts/non tracing syscalls only save upto here: */
up to
> #define R11 48
> #define R10 56
> #define R9 64
Thanks,
--
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists