linux-kernel - Re: CPUFREQ: Ondemand and powernow-k8 enhancements/fixes/cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090203212106.GK10486@codemonkey.org.uk>
Date:	Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:21:06 -0500
From:	Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>
To:	Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
Cc:	mark.langsdorf@....com, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
	venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CPUFREQ: Ondemand and powernow-k8 enhancements/fixes/cleanups

On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 05:46:39PM +0100, Thomas Renninger wrote:
 > These are the same I sent out some days ago, but messed up the
 > cpufreq list address.
 > 
 > The patches are based against Dave's cpufreq git tree's fixes branch.

'fixes' is for stuff pending for .29, which this patchset seems out
of scope for.  Unfortunatly, there's a ton of checkpatch cleanups up
the 'next' branch which makes this impossible to apply.

Can you rediff against that branch please?
 
thanks,

	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/