[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090203222501.GC2857@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 23:25:01 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
To: Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>
Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Doug Thompson <norsk5@...oo.com>, ncunningham-lkml@...a.org.au,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
bluesmoke-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: marching through all physical memory in software
Hi!
>>> The next question is who handles the conversion of the various
>>> different arch-specific BIOS mappings to a standard format that we
>>> can feed to the background "scrub" code. Is this something that
>>> belongs in the edac memory controller code, or would it live in
>>> /arch/foo somewhere?
>>
>>
>> If it's intended to be something basically stand-alone that doesn't require
>> an actual EDAC chipset, it should probably live elsewhere. Otherwise, you get
>> into the case of people who don't enable it because they "know" their hardware
>> doesn't have an EDAC ability, even if they *could* benefit from the function.
>>
>> On the other hand, if it's an EDAC-only thing, maybe under drivers/edac/$ARCH?
>
> I don't see anything in the name of EDAC that implies hardware only...a
> software memory scrub could be considered "error detection and
> correction". Might have to update the config help text though.
Software memory scrub would no longer be a "driver" :-). So it should
go into kernel/scrub or mm/scrub or maybe mm/edac or something.
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists