[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090203144647.09bf9c97.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:46:47 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp, lizf@...fujitsu.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [-mm patch] Show memcg information during OOM (v3)
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 22:51:35 +0530
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Description: Add RSS and swap to OOM output from memcg
>
> From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Changelog v3..v2
> 1. Use static char arrays of size PATH_MAX in order to make
> the OOM message more reliable.
>
> Changelog v2..v1:
>
> 1. Add more information about task's memcg and the memcg
> over it's limit
> 2. Print data in KB
> 3. Move the print routine outside task_lock()
> 4. Use rcu_read_lock() around cgroup_path, strictly speaking it
> is not required, but relying on the current memcg implementation
> is not a good idea.
>
>
> This patch displays memcg values like failcnt, usage and limit
> when an OOM occurs due to memcg.
>
> Thanks go out to Johannes Weiner, Li Zefan, David Rientjes,
> Kamezawa Hiroyuki, Daisuke Nishimura and KOSAKI Motohiro for
> review.
>
> Sample output
> -------------
>
> Task in /a/x killed as a result of limit of /a
> memory: usage 1048576kB, limit 1048576kB, failcnt 4183
> memory+swap: usage 1400964kB, limit 9007199254740991kB, failcnt 0
>
>
> ...
>
> +/**
> + * mem_cgroup_print_mem_info: Called from OOM with tasklist_lock held in
> + * read mode.
> + * @memcg: The memory cgroup that went over limit
> + * @p: Task that is going to be killed
> + *
> + * NOTE: @memcg and @p's mem_cgroup can be different when hierarchy is
> + * enabled
> + */
> +void mem_cgroup_print_oom_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> + struct cgroup *task_cgrp;
> + struct cgroup *mem_cgrp;
> + /*
> + * Need a buffer on stack, can't rely on allocations. The code relies
> + * on the assumption that OOM is serialized for memory controller.
> + * If this assumption is broken, revisit this code.
> + */
> + static char task_memcg_name[PATH_MAX];
> + static char memcg_name[PATH_MAX];
I don't think we need both of these. With a bit of shuffling we could
reuse the single buffer?
fixlets..
- kerneldoc requires that the function description be a single line
- unmunge whitespace
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c~memcg-show-memcg-information-during-oom-fix
+++ a/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -724,8 +724,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_count_children_cb(
}
/**
- * mem_cgroup_print_mem_info: Called from OOM with tasklist_lock held in
- * read mode.
+ * mem_cgroup_print_mem_info: Called from OOM with tasklist_lock held in read mode.
* @memcg: The memory cgroup that went over limit
* @p: Task that is going to be killed
*
@@ -762,7 +761,7 @@ void mem_cgroup_print_oom_info(struct me
goto done;
}
ret = cgroup_path(mem_cgrp, memcg_name, PATH_MAX);
- if (ret < 0) {
+ if (ret < 0) {
rcu_read_unlock();
goto done;
}
diff -puN mm/oom_kill.c~memcg-show-memcg-information-during-oom-fix mm/oom_kill.c
_
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists