[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090203231711.GA5020@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 00:17:11 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ia64: ptrace_attach_sync_user_rbs: use ->sighand
instead of ->signal to check the task is alive
No functional changes.
It doesn't matter which pointer to check under tasklist to ensure the task
was not released, ->signal or ->sighand. But we are going to make ->signal
refcountable, change the code to use ->sighand.
Actually, this code doesn't need tasklist_lock and this check at all, it
should be converted to use lock_task_sighand().
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
--- 6.29-rc3/arch/ia64/kernel/ptrace.c~1_IA64_PTRACE 2008-12-02 17:12:35.000000000 +0100
+++ 6.29-rc3/arch/ia64/kernel/ptrace.c 2009-02-03 23:55:41.000000000 +0100
@@ -640,7 +640,7 @@ ptrace_attach_sync_user_rbs (struct task
*/
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
- if (child->signal) {
+ if (child->sighand) {
spin_lock_irq(&child->sighand->siglock);
if (child->state == TASK_STOPPED &&
!test_and_set_tsk_thread_flag(child, TIF_RESTORE_RSE)) {
@@ -664,7 +664,7 @@ ptrace_attach_sync_user_rbs (struct task
* job control stop, so that SIGCONT can be used to wake it up.
*/
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
- if (child->signal) {
+ if (child->sighand) {
spin_lock_irq(&child->sighand->siglock);
if (child->state == TASK_TRACED &&
(child->signal->flags & SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED)) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists