linux-kernel - Re: cgroup mount point

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090204003847.308cd0df@sbs173>
Date:	Wed, 4 Feb 2009 00:38:47 +0100
From:	Harald Braumann <harry@...eit.net>
To:	Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
Cc:	sean finney <seanius@...nius.net>,
	Gustavo Noronha <kov@...ian.org>,
	debian-devel@...ts.debian.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: cgroup mount point

On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 11:14:03 -0800
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 10:51 AM, sean finney <seanius@...nius.net>
> wrote:
> > or /proc/bus/usb or /dev/shm or /dev/pts... :)
> >
> 
> /dev is a bit different though - even if it's mounted as a udev fs,
> you can create a new directory in there to act as a mount point.

So, what's the problem with /dev/cgroups then? If shm/ and pts/
are allowed under /dev, wouldn't it be discriminating against
cgroups/, to not allow it there?

Cheers,
harry

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)