[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090203121524.cdff11ae.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:15:24 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: "Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@...tel.com>
Cc: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@...aslivre.org>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
debian-devel@...ts.debian.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: cgroup mount point
On Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:54:58 -0600
"Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@...tel.com> wrote:
> Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
>
> > Linux Documentation is not consistent and have some funny options. In
> > Documentation/cgroups/*, we have:
>
> > So, we have some more options now: /cgroups, /containers, /dev/cpuset,
> > /dev/cpuctl, /opt/cgroup, /opt/cpuset.
> >
> > I am copying the container and the kernel guys. Perhaps, we can find an
> > agreement (if we want to find one at all) and change all that
> > Documentation to get consistent.
>
> I'd vote for "cgroups" or "containers", mounted at / or /sys/.
>
me, too.
But single mount point just assumes "all necessary subsystems are mounter at once"
So,
/cgroup/<subsys>/ #this cannot handle multiple subsyses.
or
/cgroup/some_nick_name #just depends on users.
Hmm. Making documentation to use the same mount point is not so bad. But in real
usage, cgroup's mount point seems case-by-case.
If libcgroup or libvirt shows some policy, it's good for users.
/cgroup/<libcgroup's grouping nick name>/ ...
or some.
Thanks,
-Kame
> /opt feels more like where software should live, and /dev should be for
> devices rather than capabilities/management. "cpuctl" and "cpuset" are
> subsets of the full capabilities of cgroups, so they're suboptimal as
> far as naming.
>
> Chris
> _______________________________________________
> Containers mailing list
> Containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists