linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] PCI PM: More refinements of suspend-resume framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0902021924270.3247@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:25:42 -0800 (PST)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] PCI PM: More refinements of suspend-resume
 framework



On Mon, 2 Feb 2009, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> >
> > The last patch makes the warning in pci_legacy_suspend() more useful.
> 
> Linus, do you want these as part of the next pull request?  If so, I'll check 
> them out, pull them in, and let them run the linux-next build gauntlet for a 
> day before sending them.  Otherwise I'll just send a pull request today with 
> the 8 or so fixes I have queued now.

I want them eventually, but I don't know if we got confirmation that this 
particular series actually fixed the PCI-E bridge issue? The one that 
Parag reported.. It would be good to have confirmation. Maybe we do 
already and I missed that email?

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/