lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090204060513.GA28321@srcf.ucam.org>
Date:	Wed, 4 Feb 2009 06:05:13 +0000
From:	Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>
To:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc:	Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@...il.com>,
	Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
	khali@...ux-fr.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: add "auto" to acpi_enforce_resources

On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 12:52:06AM -0500, Len Brown wrote:

> While it is slightly off-topic of the (I agree, real)
> technical issue here, note that polling is not "normal" on ACPI systems.
> [1] was on  SuSE Linux 10.0, which on their own decided to
> over-ride the kernel and enable thermal zone polling by default.

Checking the DSDTs I have to hand, it seems that polling is expected on 
about 5% of systems via an explicit _TZP and on almost all machines via 
_TSP. Even on systems where thermal notifications are provided, it's 
still up to the OS to poll the zone to find the current temperature and 
take appropriate action. There's still a window for native smbus drivers 
to screw everything up.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ