[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090204100704.GA19498@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:07:05 +0000
From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jesse Barnes <jesse.barnes@...el.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andreas Schwab <schwab@...e.de>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: Reworking suspend-resume sequence (was: Re: PCI PM: Restore standard config registers of all devices early)
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 10:12:04PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Feb 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > So i'd still like your tentative Signed-off-by for your patch - it's i think
> > not v2.6.29 material but if it stays problem free in testing we can try it
> > in v2.6.30. If it causes problem it will be clearly bisectable and clearly
> > revertable.
> >
> > Maybe we could split it in two: and for MSI we could introduce a 'simpler
> > and faster' edge flow as well - and keep the legacy handler untouched. That
> > way it's low-risk in its entirety. (and avoids the MSI ->mask complication
> > as well.)
>
> Yes, seperating out the MSI handler into it's own flow control is the
> right way to go. We had trouble with real edge hardware and IIRC most
> of the problems originated from ARM. rmk ??
No idea, too long ago.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists