[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m3skmubktj.fsf@ursa.amorsen.dk>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 10:41:44 +0100
From: Benny Amorsen <benny+usenet@...rsen.dk>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, zbr@...emap.net, jarkao2@...il.com,
w@....eu, dada1@...mosbay.com, ben@...s.com, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
jens.axboe@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tcp: splice as many packets as possible at once
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:
> From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
>> Granted copying sucks, but this is really because the underlying
>> hardware is badly designed. Also copying is way better than
>> not receiving at all due to memory fragmentation.
>
> This scheme sounds very reasonable.
Would it be possible to add a counter somewhere for this, or is that
too expensive?
/Benny
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists