linux-kernel - Re: Comparison between .28 and .29-rc3 for STR cycle

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200902041302.49497.elendil@planet.nl>
Date:	Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:02:48 +0100
From:	Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Comparison between .28 and .29-rc3 for STR cycle

On Tuesday 03 February 2009, you wrote:
> # Weird, we already did a config restore at offset 0x7 4 lines up!
> # So where does this next line come from?
>  +pcieport-driver 0000:00:1c.0: restoring config space at offset 0x7 (was 0xf0, writing 0x200000f0)

This line is gone with Rafael's latest PM IDE patch series applied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/