[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090204230851.GF18484@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:08:51 -0800
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: tom.leiming@...il.com, kay.sievers@...y.org,
cornelia.huck@...ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: remove polling for driver_probe_done(v3)
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 06:52:24AM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:48:35 +0800
> tom.leiming@...il.com wrote:
>
> > From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
> >
> > This patch adds a function : driver_wait_probe_done,
> > which waits on condition of probing done to replace
> > polling for driver_probe_done in fs initialization.
> >
> > There is no better way to avoid polling for
> > driver_probe_done _and_ existence of the root device,
> > so we does not replace the driver_probe_done with
> > driver_wait_probe_done in such special case.
> >
> > Removing polling in fs initialization may lead to
> > a faster boot.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
>
> ok this one will work fine ;)
>
> Reviewed-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
>
> thanks for fixing this up
> (it will clash with the patch that moves this to one place, but the
> same cleanup can be done there)
What patch is that? Should i be taking this? Or are they in some other
tree?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists