[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090204115047.ECB5.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:51:43 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: MinChan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fix mlocked page counter mistmatch
> > Could you please teach me why this issue doesn't happend on munlockall()?
> > your scenario seems to don't depend on exit_mmap().
>
>
> Good question.
> It's a different issue.
> It is related to mmap_sem locking issue.
>
> Actually, I am about to make a patch.
> But, I can't understand that Why try_do_mlock_page should downgrade mm_sem ?
> Is it necessary ?
>
> In munlockall path, mmap_sem already is holding in write-mode of mmap_sem.
> so, try_to_mlock_page always fail to downgrade mmap_sem.
> It's why it looks like working well about mlocked counter.
lastest linus tree don't have downgrade mmap_sem.
(recently it was removed)
please see it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists