[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090204194310.1d5e96ae.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 19:43:10 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
adobriyan@...il.com, ebierderm@...ssion.com, stable@...nel.org,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Separate FMODE_PREAD/FMODE_PWRITE into separate flags
On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 19:42:03 -0800 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> And I updated seq_file-properly-cope-with-pread.patch thusly:
>
> --- a/fs/seq_file.c~seq_file-properly-cope-with-pread-fix
> +++ a/fs/seq_file.c
> @@ -48,6 +48,16 @@ int seq_open(struct file *file, const st
> */
> file->f_version = 0;
>
> + /*
> + * seq_files support lseek() and pread(). They do not implement
> + * write() at all, but we clear FMODE_PWRITE here for historical
> + * reasons.
> + *
> + * If a client of seq_files a) implements file.write() and b) wishes to
> + * support pwrite() then that client will need to implement its own
> + * file.open() which calls seq_open() and then sets FMODE_WRITE.
^P
> + */
> + file->f_mode &= ~FMODE_PWRITE;
> return 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(seq_open);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists