linux-kernel - Re: [4/7] dst: thread pool.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2892.1233842127@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 05 Feb 2009 13:55:27 +0000
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dst@...emap.net
Subject: Re: [4/7] dst: thread pool.

Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> wrote:

> > 2: David Howells' "slow work" infrastructure
> 
> this one is *weird*. The infrastructure deals with object refcounting
> somehow. 

The slow-work facility keeps a reference on the object you've asked it to call
a function to be called upon until it has finished calling that function.
This simplifies the object handling code a lot, and allows you to avoid
slow-work synchronisation requests in object destructors.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/