[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090205181329.GA5661@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 19:13:29 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@...gle.com>
Cc: Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rientjes@...gle.com,
mbligh@...gle.com, thockin@...gle.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] softlockup: convert read_lock in hung_task to
rcu_read_lock
* Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@...gle.com> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar (mingo@...e.hu) wrote:
> >
> > I've applied your patch to tip:core/softlockup, thanks Mandeep!
> >
>
> Oops, I put the conversion to rcu_read_lock in a seperate patch. I
> understand now the convention is to use a patch series only when the
> patches can be applied independently.
What you did is in fact the preferred approach: keep independent stuff
independent and make patches as gradual and split-up as possible. (as long
as the interim state is a working kernel too)
> ---
> Since the tasklist is protected by rcu list operations, it is safe
> to convert the read_lock()s to rcu_read_lock().
>
> Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> Signed-off-by: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@...gle.com>
> ---
> kernel/hung_task.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Applied to tip:core/softlockup, thanks!
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists