linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] driver core: remove polling for driver_probe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090205180856.GA20805@kroah.com>
Date:	Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:08:56 -0800
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc:	tom.leiming@...il.com, kay.sievers@...y.org,
	cornelia.huck@...ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: remove polling for driver_probe_done(v3)

On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 05:08:58PM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:08:51 -0800
> Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 06:52:24AM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > > On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:48:35 +0800
> > > tom.leiming@...il.com wrote:
> > > 
> > > > From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
> > > > 
> > > > This patch adds a function : driver_wait_probe_done,
> > > > which waits on condition of probing done to replace
> > > > polling for driver_probe_done in fs initialization.
> > > > 
> > > > There is no better way to avoid polling for
> > > > driver_probe_done _and_ existence of the root device,
> > > > so we does not replace the driver_probe_done with
> > > > driver_wait_probe_done in such special case.
> > > > 
> > > > Removing polling in fs initialization may lead to
> > > > a faster boot.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
> > > 
> > > ok this one will work fine ;)
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
> > > 
> > > thanks for fixing this up 
> > > (it will clash with the patch that moves this to one place, but the
> > > same cleanup can be done there)
> > 
> > What patch is that?  Should i be taking this?  Or are they in some
> > other tree?
> 
> it's the suspend-resume regression fixes that either you already have
> or that raphael sent to you

Hm, ok, I don't see any left in my tree, or queue, so perhaps someone
might want to resend them to me?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/