linux-kernel - Re: [Bug #12491] i915 lockdep warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200902050203.40535.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date:	Thu, 5 Feb 2009 02:03:39 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>, Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Brandeburg\, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
	drivers_video-dri@...nel-bugs.osdl.org,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug #12491] i915 lockdep warning

[Adding CCs.]

On Wednesday 04 February 2009, Roland Dreier wrote:
>  > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12491
>  > Subject		: i915 lockdep warning
>  > Submitter	: Brandeburg, Jesse <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
>  > Date		: 2009-01-13 23:17 (23 days old)
>  > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123188898423532&w=4
> 
> Looking at the code, it seems that the issue is that the DRM
> struct_mutex must be taken inside mmap_sem (because struct_mutex is
> taken in drm_vm_open(), which is called with mmap_sem already held), but
> i915_gem_execbuffer() does a copy_to_user() while holding struct_mutex,
> and if this copy faults, then the VM tries to acquire mmap_sem -- ie
> lockdep identifies correctly a potential AB/BA deadlock.
> 
> I don't pretend to fully understand the DRM or GEM, but a possible fix
> is below -- would be worth it to test and review, and get into 2.6.29 if
> it is a correct fix:
> 
> ---
> i915: Fix potential AB-BA deadlock in i915_gem_execbuffer()
> 
> Lockdep warns that i915_gem_execbuffer() can trigger a page fault (which
> takes mmap_sem) while holding dev->struct_mutex, while drm_vm_open()
> (which is called with mmap_sem already held) takes dev->struct_mutex.
> So this is a potential AB-BA deadlock.
> 
> The way that i915_gem_execbuffer() triggers a page fault is by doing
> copy_to_user() when returning new buffer offsets back to userspace;
> however there is no reason to hold the struct_mutex when doing this
> copy, since what is being copied is a private array anyway.  So we can
> fix the potential deadlock (and get rid of the lockdep warning) by
> simply moving the copy_to_user() outside of where struct_mutex is held.
> 
> This fixes <http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12491>.
> 
> Reported-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Roland Dreier <rolandd@...co.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c |   21 ++++++++++++---------
>  1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index debad5c..23aad8c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -2610,15 +2610,6 @@ i915_gem_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>  
>  	i915_verify_inactive(dev, __FILE__, __LINE__);
>  
> -	/* Copy the new buffer offsets back to the user's exec list. */
> -	ret = copy_to_user((struct drm_i915_relocation_entry __user *)
> -			   (uintptr_t) args->buffers_ptr,
> -			   exec_list,
> -			   sizeof(*exec_list) * args->buffer_count);
> -	if (ret)
> -		DRM_ERROR("failed to copy %d exec entries "
> -			  "back to user (%d)\n",
> -			   args->buffer_count, ret);
>  err:
>  	for (i = 0; i < pinned; i++)
>  		i915_gem_object_unpin(object_list[i]);
> @@ -2628,6 +2619,18 @@ err:
>  
>  	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
>  
> +	if (!ret) {
> +		/* Copy the new buffer offsets back to the user's exec list. */
> +		ret = copy_to_user((struct drm_i915_relocation_entry __user *)
> +				   (uintptr_t) args->buffers_ptr,
> +				   exec_list,
> +				   sizeof(*exec_list) * args->buffer_count);
> +		if (ret)
> +			DRM_ERROR("failed to copy %d exec entries "
> +				  "back to user (%d)\n",
> +				  args->buffer_count, ret);
> +	}
> +
>  pre_mutex_err:
>  	drm_free(object_list, sizeof(*object_list) * args->buffer_count,
>  		 DRM_MEM_DRIVER);
> --
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/