[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090205194125.GA3129@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 20:41:25 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Daniel Lowengrub <lowdanie@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.28 1/2] memory: improve find_vma
* Daniel Lowengrub <lowdanie@...il.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> >
> > you should time it:
> >
> > time ./mmap-perf
> >
> > and compare the before/after results.
> >
> > Ingo
> >
>
> I made a script that runs 'time ./mmap-perf' 100 times and outputs the
> average. The output on the standard kernel was:
>
> real: 1.022600
> user: 0.135900
> system: 0.852600
>
> The output after the patch was:
>
> real: 0.815400
> user: 0.113200
> system: 0.622200
>
> These results were consistent which isn't surprising considering the
> fact that they themselves are averages.
> What do you think?
Those nymbers look very convincing to me, a cool 25.4% speedup!
mmap-perf is very MM intense - including vma lookup.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists