linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 36 of 36] x86: make the X

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <498B4E64.4090505@goop.org>
Date:	Thu, 05 Feb 2009 12:39:00 -0800
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 36 of 36] x86: make the X_bad functions consistent

Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>
>   
>> Impact: cleanup
>>
>> Use the same logic to implement all 3 _bad() functions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>
>>     
>
> A backward step in my opinion.
>   

OK, I'm happy to go the other way.  I'll give it a spin.

    J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/