[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090205203731.1E02BFC381@magilla.sf.frob.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:37:31 -0800 (PST)
From: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] ptrace: reintroduce __ptrace_detach() as a callee
of ptrace_exit()
> > Given its content, this function now better belongs in ptrace.c, I think.
>
> I don't completely agree... This helper imho has nothing to do with
> ptracing, except it does __ptrace_unlink(). But OK, I will move it
> if you prefer.
Obviously where it goes is not a big deal. But I think it's clear that it
has everything to do with ptrace and nothing to do with anything else.
It resolves a situation that can only arise because of ptrace magic.
> In that case we should export task_detached().
Or just recognize that this trivial wrapper around == -1 has little
value two lines away from a place where = -1 is done explicitly.
Really, the "abstraction" is more confusing than not in this function, IMHO.
Thanks,
Roland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists