[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <12c511ca0902051430w78ca10d9rf96804748ce6ea79@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 14:30:45 -0800
From: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] percpu: Refactor percpu.h
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com> wrote:
> Refactor the DEFINE_PER_CPU_* macros and add .data.percpu.first
> section.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
> diff --git a/include/linux/percpu.h b/include/linux/percpu.h
> index 9f2a375..0e24202 100644
> --- a/include/linux/percpu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/percpu.h
...
> +#define DEFINE_PER_CPU_SECTION(type, name, section) \
> + __attribute__((__section__(PER_CPU_BASE_SECTION section))) \
> PER_CPU_ATTRIBUTES __typeof__(type) per_cpu__##name
Brian,
This causes errors for CONFIG_SMP=n builds on ia64. If you look
at arch/ia64/include/asm/percpu.h you'll see that the !SMP case has
#define PER_CPU_ATTRIBUTES __attribute__((__section__(".data.percpu")))
So we end up with section attributes of both ".data" and
".data.percpu" for every
DEFINE_PER_CPU used. The compiler doesn't like that at all :-(
Perhaps PER_CPU_BASE_SECTION needs to be defined by <asm/percpu.h>
so ia64 can avoid the section conflict?
-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists