linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] fix the itimer regression (BZ 12618)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1233895919.2604.323.camel@ymzhang>
Date:	Fri, 06 Feb 2009 12:51:59 +0800
From:	"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, tglx@...utronix.de,
	oleg@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com, ming.m.lin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] fix the itimer regression (BZ 12618)

On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 13:06 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:
> 
> > This should hopefully address all the itimer borkage.
> 
> Applied to tip:timers/urgent, thanks Peter!
> 
> Yanmin: could you check hacbench_pth with latest tip/master, do
> these fixes resolve that 3% regression you reported?
Lin Ming tested it and hackbench_pth/volanoMark regression all
disappear. But oltp has a regression. We think oltp new regression isn't related
to the patch. Ming is investigating it.

Yanmin


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/