[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090206080354.GA6516@barrios-desktop>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 17:03:54 +0900
From: MinChan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3][RFC] swsusp: shrink file cache first
Hi, Johannes.
I have some questions.
Just out of curiosity. :)
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 04:11:28AM +0100, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> File cache pages are saved to disk either through normal writeback by
> reclaim or by including them in the suspend image written to a
> swapfile.
>
> Writing them either way should take the same amount of time but doing
> normal writeback and unmap changes the fault behaviour on resume from
> prefault to on-demand paging, smoothening out resume and giving
What do you mean "unmap"?
Why normal writeback and unmap chnages the fault behavior on resume ?
> previously cached pages the chance to stay out of memory completely if
> they are not used anymore.
>
> Another reason for preferring file page eviction is that the locality
> principle is visible in fault patterns and swap might perform really
> bad with subsequent faulting of contiguously mapped pages.
Why do you think that swap might perform bad with subsequent faulting
of contiguusly mapped page ?
You mean normal file system is faster than swap due to readahead and
smart block of allocation ?
--
Kinds Regards
MinChan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists