[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090206134253.GA9919@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 14:42:53 +0100
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
hskinnemoen@...el.com, cooloney@...nel.org, tony.luck@...el.com,
ralf@...ux-mips.org, dhowells@...hat.com, matthew@....cx,
chris@...kel.net, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-ia64 <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-next][PATCH] revert headers_check fix: ia64, fpu.h
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 05:19:00PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/asm/fpu.h b/arch/ia64/include/asm/fpu.h
> > index 3859558..b6395ad 100644
> > --- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/fpu.h
> > +++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/fpu.h
> > @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
> > * David Mosberger-Tang <davidm@....hp.com>
> > */
> >
> > -#include <asm/types.h>
> > +#include <linux/types.h>
>
> this change break ia64 build perfectly.
> this patch seems don't tested at all.
>
> Ingo, I hope you ask patch author how to test posted patch ;-)
Patch author test the patch by adding it to a git tree that hits -next.
And this catched ths bug - so -next served its purpose.
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists