linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] nmi: add generic nmi tracking state

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0902060956480.10059@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date:	Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:59:26 -0500 (EST)
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] nmi: add generic nmi tracking state


On Fri, 6 Feb 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Is it OK to rebase the branch to do so?
> 
> Sure, that's necessary.

OK, will do.

> 
> And note that unless you base your tree against tip:tracing/ftrace i cannot 
> do a straight pull anyway. (your trees are usually based against tip:master 
> - which brings in all other branches)

Which is better for you? Should I base it off of tracing/ftrace instead? I 
just been using master to make sure I did not break anything else in your 
repo ;-)

I can set up a branch called tip/ftrace/devel that will be based off of 
tracing/ftrace, and keep tip/devel off of tip/master. This will let
you know which repo my post is based off of. I'll also add it to the 
subject.

-- Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/