[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1233932407.3209.18.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 20:30:07 +0530
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
hskinnemoen@...el.com, cooloney@...nel.org, ralf@...ux-mips.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, matthew@....cx, chris@...kel.net,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git pull -tip] headers_check fixes for other architectures
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 14:51 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > >
> > > So no point including this file in assembly with this patch - the ifndef
> > > disables the entire file.
> >
> > Truth Table of linux/types.h :
> >
> > If Assembly then N
> > otherwise Y
> >
> > what your table says.
>
> If the entire file is not suitable for assembly, don't include the file
> in assembly files. Nice and simple, and no need to add additional ifdefs.
Ahh, so your truth table says:
If Assembly then make different header files
If C then make another header files
Do not you think your truth table is complex and very difficult to
handle and maintain ?
Can we make things simple and easier.
Thanks,
--
JSR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists