[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1233936914.3135.19.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 11:15:14 -0500
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@...hat.com>
Cc: Linux Audit <linux-audit@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
David Safford <safford@...son.ibm.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: integrity: audit
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 10:01 -0500, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Friday 06 February 2009 07:43:50 am Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > This patch adds support to auditd for integrity messages, which are
> > issued as a result of the integrity patchset that was applied to the
> > security-testing-2.6/#next tree.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ibm.com>
>
> NACK to anything around this. So far, no integrity patches have been reviewed
> by the audit folks.
>
> -Steve
The integrity auditing discussions took place a while ago in August 2007
(http://osdir.com/ml/linux.redhat.security.audit/2007-09/msg00007.html).
The integrity patches are in security-testing-2.6/#next and the auditd
patch I just posted to linux-audit. How do you suggest we go forward?
Thanks!
Mimi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists