lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090207164707.GA19149@linux-os.sc.intel.com>
Date:	Sat, 7 Feb 2009 08:47:07 -0800
From:	"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
	H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"thomas@...ux-os.sc.intel.com" <thomas@...ux-os.sc.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Add clflush before monitor for Intel 7400 series - v2

On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 06:02:45AM -0800, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 16:47:29 -0800
> "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > 
> > For Intel 7400 series CPUs, the recommendation is to use a clflush on the
> > monitored address just before monitor and mwait pair [1]. This clflush makes
> > sure that there are no false wakeups from mwait when the monitored address
> > was recently written to.
> 
> Given our mwait usages will very quickly go back to sleep in such a case
> and it would almost certainly be one sleep only is this really worth the
> effort ?

Yes. If we only consider the CPU idle behavior, we really do not need the
patch as we will go back to idle. But, there are other factors:
- drivers/idle/i7300_idle.c  which tries to save memory power based on CPU
  idle time. It gets confused with these short idles.
- cpuidle menu governor  These platforms may also support more than one C-state.
  C1 and CC3. So, we will go through the C-state policy in menu governor, which
  again looks at idle time and may end up taking wrong decisions due to these
  short idles.

We can make the above code to be more clever, to ignore short idles. But, this
patch seems to be the easier and clean way as the errata is only in a particular
CPU model.

Thanks,
Venki
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ