| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <498CFD95.5070004@kernel.org> Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 19:18:45 -0800 From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> CC: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: state of some x86 acpi patches Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Yinghai Lu wrote: >> Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: >> >>> Ingo Molnar wrote: >>> >>>> yes, that end result is the desired state of things. We did run with >>>> this for several months and resolved all the cases that needed fixing, >>>> but dropped them when the ACPI tree moved out from under us. >>>> >>>> Can resurrect it if Len feels OK about the concept. Len, you shouldnt >>>> worry about conflicts - we can do it after the ACPI changes of this >>>> merge window are upstream so there should be no conflict trouble at >>>> all. How does that sound? >>>> >>> Doesn't look like these changes made it in this time. Did they get >>> overlooked, or did some other problem come up? Or did you want me to >>> dig them up? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> J >>> >> >> >> please check attached that are updated to today tip/master with ingo's >> genapic patchset.. >> > > The look OK, but they didn't get merged into tip/master? > Ingo is too busy... It seems Len already agreed those patches can go through tip. Ingo? YH -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists