[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0902062221050.26256@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 22:35:24 -0500 (EST)
From: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: find nr_irqs_gsi with mp_ioapic_routing
> Impact: find right nr_irqs_gsi on some systems.
>
> one system has gap between gsi.
> [ 0.000000] ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x04] address[0xfec00000] gsi_base[0])
> [ 0.000000] IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 4, version 0, address 0xfec00000, GSI 0-23
> [ 0.000000] ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x05] address[0xfeafd000] gsi_base[48])
> [ 0.000000] IOAPIC[1]: apic_id 5, version 0, address 0xfeafd000, GSI 48-54
> [ 0.000000] ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x06] address[0xfeafc000] gsi_base[56])
> [ 0.000000] IOAPIC[2]: apic_id 6, version 0, address 0xfeafc000, GSI 56-62
> ...
> [ 0.000000] nr_irqs_gsi: 38
I've never seen gaps in GSIs.
I've never seen IOAPICs with 7 redirection table entries.
This system looks quite broken even before the probe for nr_irqs_gsi.
Do you have more information on it?
thanks,
-Len
--
Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists