linux-kernel - Re: [git pull] ACPI patches for 2.6.29-rc3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 07 Feb 2009 11:21:23 +0000
From:	Richard Hughes <hughsient@...il.com>
To:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [git pull] ACPI patches for 2.6.29-rc3

On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 01:59 -0500, Len Brown wrote:
> Nothing too Earth-shaking.
> This will update the files shown below.

No sign of my battery patch (attached, again) to fix the confirmed
userspace breakage of the acpi battery on some hardware (T61 and other
Lenovo models).

I've filed http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12632 and it's in
status "RESOLVED CODE_FIX" but it seems nobody has done anything with
the patch.

Please, tell me what I need to do to get this merged. If it's not merged
soon, I'll just switch HAL back to using /proc/acpi by default as it's
affecting real users right now.

Thanks,

Richard.

View attachment "0001-battery-don-t-assume-we-are-fully-charged-when-not.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (2260 bytes)