[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <498F2608.9030809@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 12:35:52 -0600
From: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@...il.com>
To: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
CC: davej@...emonkey.org.uk, mark.langsdorf@....com,
cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] CPUFREQ: powernow-k8: Get transition latency from
ACPI _PSS table
Thomas Renninger wrote:
> From: Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@....com>
>
> At this time, the PowerNow! driver for K8 uses an experimentally
> derived formula to calculate transition latency. The value it
> provides is orders of magnitude too large on modern systems.
> This patch replaces the formula with ACPI _PSS latency values
> for more accuracy and better performance.
>
> I've tested it on two 2nd generation Opteron systems, a 3rd
> generation Operton system, and a Turion X2 without seeing any
> stability problems.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Hopefully somebody is pushing this for .29? This seems to make a big
difference in system responsiveness on my Athlon X2 system.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists