[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090208184730.GA27086@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 19:47:30 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] ptrace_untrace: fix the SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED check
This bug is ancient too. ptrace_untrace() must not resume the task
if the group stop in progress, we should set TASK_STOPPED instead.
Unfortunately, we still have problems here:
- if the process/thread was traced, SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED
does not necessary means this thread group is stopped.
- ptrace breaks the bookkeeping of ->group_stop_count.
(the comment above ptrace_untrace() doesn't look exactly right too).
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
--- 6.29-rc3/kernel/ptrace.c~3_FIX_STOPPED 2009-02-08 06:22:26.000000000 +0100
+++ 6.29-rc3/kernel/ptrace.c 2009-02-08 08:52:14.000000000 +0100
@@ -60,7 +60,8 @@ static void ptrace_untrace(struct task_s
{
spin_lock(&child->sighand->siglock);
if (task_is_traced(child)) {
- if (child->signal->flags & SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED)
+ if (child->signal->flags & SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED ||
+ child->signal->group_stop_count)
__set_task_state(child, TASK_STOPPED);
else
wake_up_process(child);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists