linux-kernel - Re: [linux-pm] 2.6.29-rc4: Reported regressions from 2.6.28

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0902081652120.22400-100000@netrider.rowland.org>
Date:	Sun, 8 Feb 2009 16:57:23 -0500 (EST)
From:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To:	Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] 2.6.29-rc4: Reported regressions from 2.6.28

On Sun, 8 Feb 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12668
> Subject		: USB flash disk surprise disconnect
> Submitter	: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
> Date		: 2009-02-08 10:21 (1 days old)
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123408851821292&w=4

Is there any reason to think this is a regression rather than a 
one-time fluke?

If it really is a regression, additional debugging info would help.  
The log excerpt in the email report doesn't show anything that happened
prior to the disconnect.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/