linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] bootgraph: fix for use with dot symbols

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <18314.1234054645@neuling.org>
Date:	Sun, 08 Feb 2009 11:57:25 +1100
From:	Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>
To:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
cc:	linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, benh@...nel.crashing.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bootgraph: fix for use with dot symbols 

> > question for the ppc folks.... why does the "print symbol" magic format str
ing
> > thing print a dot symbol and not the real function name?
> > Should that be fixed instead?
> 
> We have two symbols for each function, foo points to the function
> descriptor, and .foo points to the instruction text. If we were to strip
> the '.' when we print symbols then it would become harder to diagnose
> some failures (eg branching to the function descriptor instead of the
> instruction text).

Arjan,

I don't think there is much scope for removing dot symbols in the near
future.

Can you please take the patch as is for now so bootgraph will at least
work for existing systems?

Mikey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/